APIC – FRS Document guide lines

Functional Requirements Specification Document

What Are Functional Requirements?

Functional requirements define what a product, system, subsystem, or software component must do. They describe the system’s behavior—its operations, workflows, inputs/outputs, user interactions, safety behaviors, and access control mechanisms.

See How to Build an APIC System for Software Engineers for where the FRS fits into the overall system-engineering workflow — each model's logic is extracted directly from this document.

Types of Functional Requirements

  • Operational workflows and system behaviors
  • Input/output data formats and validation rules
  • User interface interactions
  • Data integrity and security rules
  • Safety and regulatory behaviors
  • User authentication and authorization processes

Functional vs. Non-Functional Requirements

A functional requirement states what the system must do.
Example: The control system shall prevent engine overspeed.

A non-functional requirement defines constraints or qualities of the system—how it must be built or behave.
Example: Communication between subsystems must use a MIL-STD-1553B digital bus.

Examples Across Industries

Software Development

  • The system shall return search results within 0.5 seconds.
  • If a user fails login three times, the system shall lock the account for 10 minutes.

Automotive

  • The lane assist system shall alert the driver when drifting without signaling.
  • The vehicle shall automatically notify emergency services within 30 seconds after airbag deployment.

Healthcare

  • The EHR system shall retrieve patient history within 3 seconds.
  • The insulin pump shall deliver dosage with ±1% accuracy.

E-Commerce

  • The platform shall process credit-card transactions and confirm within 5 seconds.
  • When a product is out of stock, the system shall show an alert and disable the Add to Cart button.

Common Mistakes in Writing Functional Requirements

1. Ambiguity

Vague requirements cause misinterpretation.
Bad: “The system should be fast.”
Good: “The system shall respond within 0.3 seconds.”

2. Combining multiple requirements

Break complex statements into individual requirements.

3. Mixing functional and non-functional rules

Keep separate what the system does vs. how well it must perform.

4. Not ensuring testability

All requirements must be measurable and verifiable.

5. Excessive technical jargon

Write clearly so technical and non-technical teams understand.

6. Missing rationale

Explain why a requirement exists to avoid misinterpretation.

7. Not updating requirements

Regular reviews prevent outdated or invalid requirements.

8. Over-engineering

Focus on actual value—avoid unnecessary complexity.

EARS Requirement Archetypes

Ubiquitous

Template: The <system> shall <do something>.

State-Driven (WHILE)

Template: WHILE <state>, the system shall <do>.

Event-Driven (WHEN)

Template: WHEN <event>, the system shall <do>.

Optional Feature (WHERE)

Template: WHERE <feature exists>, the system shall <do>.

Unwanted Behavior (IF / THEN)

Template: IF <undesired condition> THEN the system shall <respond>.

Complex Requirements

Combining multiple EARS conditions (state + event + feature).

How to Write Good Functional Requirements

  1. Use consistent modal verbs (“shall” for functional, “must” for constraints).
  2. Give every requirement a unique ID.
  3. Only one requirement per statement.
  4. Keep them concise and clear.
  5. Ensure every requirement is testable.
  6. Keep rationale separate from the requirement text.

Functional Requirements Document (FRD)

An FRD is the detailed specification of what the system must do. It guides developers, informs testers, and provides stakeholders a clear expectation of system behavior.

Recommended FRD Practices

  • Organize content hierarchically (features, subsystems, functions).
  • Use consistent terminology and a project glossary.
  • Use templates or requirements management tools for traceability.

A strong FRD ensures clarity, traceability, test coverage, and alignment across engineering, quality, and validation teams—leading to a more successful product.

© 2025 APIC. DBSimGenerator Documentation.